AmeriKan Konspiracy - Free Speech | Conspiracy | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Arcade

Facebook icon Twitter icon Forward icon


Mungodave spread this controversy.

Time to vote.

Glenn Beck to Devote Whole Show To ‘Debunking Conspiracy Theories About Sandy Hook’

Glenn Beck to Devote Whole Show To ‘Debunking Conspiracy Theories About Sandy Hook’

“Conspiracy theories often distract people from the real issues”
Paul Joseph Watson
January 23, 2013
Glenn Beck will devote his entire show tonight to “debunking conspiracy theories about the Sandy Hook shootings,” in an effort to make the case that questioning the official narrative behind the massacre is a distraction from real issues and only serves to discredit pro-second amendment arguments.

Since the tragic school shooting on December 14 in Newtown, a movement which the media has dubbed “Sandy Hook truthers” has emerged to question the official story behind the event, with some even claiming the massacre never happened at all and was an elaborate construct involving media collaboration with “crisis actors” playing the role of parents and school officials.
Videos containing conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook have gone viral on YouTube, with one achieving a staggering 11.4 million views in the last 3 weeks alone.
Most of the theories put out concerning the massacre have since been debunked, but questions still remain about why no surveillance footage of Adam Lanza has been released and how he was able to carry out an assault which some have claimed would have required a military-grade level of precision, tactics and physical strength.
Public figures who have questioned the official narrative, such as Florida professor James Tracy, have been subjected to intense demonization campaigns by the likes of CNN and other mainstream media outlets.

Explaining why he is affording an entire show to addressing and “debunking” conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook, Glenn Beck, who has previously dismissed verifiable programs such as the federal government’s construction of internment camps inside America, as “conspiracy theories,” said he feared such speculation was detracting from very real conspiracies being carried out by the powers that be.
“Wouldn’t you rather have them talking about that conspiracy than what the Federal Reserve is doing, than what the federal government is doing?” asked Beck, speculating that the conspiracy theories surrounding Sandy Hook could themselves have been set up by someone like White House information czar Cass Sunstein in an attempt to shift the debate away from legitimate issues about gun control.
Beck then urged his audience to be more concerned about things like the Patriot Act (which Beck himself supported when Bush was in office) as well as Americans being snatched off the streets in the middle of the night under the NDAA (although back in 2007 Beck implied that Ron Paul supporters were terrorists who should be targeted as domestic extremists).
Beck’s co-host then cited the Obama birth certificate issue as another contrived debate that serves to move focus away from genuine cover-ups. Beck agreed that questions surrounding the “birther” issue were generated by the “lunatic fringe” and encouraged by the White House, although in reality polls show a majority of Republican voters “believe that President Obama was born in another country.”
Despite the fact that he has remained largely neutral on the issue of whether or not the Sandy Hook massacre unfolded exactly as the official narrative would have it, radio host Alex Jones has been erroneously tagged as the progenitor of many of the conspiracy theories by the mainstream media.
For example, a article published yesterday (and since mysteriously removed but cached here) claims that Jones thinks the Sandy Hook shootings were “an elaborate fiction,” and that “FEMA staged the school shooting as a way of demanding popular support for an Obama overthrow of the Second Amendment.”
Although Jones has warned that a government which ships guns to Mexican drug dealers – weapons that have been involved in hundreds of murders – cannot be trusted, the statements attributed to him by Salon’s Greg Olear are completely bogus.
However, that’s not to negate the fact that governments have staged events in the past, which is precisely why a plethora of people don’t trust the official story on anything. As Gun Owners of America’s Larry Pratt has pointed out, if the Obama administration was mendacious enough to stage Fast and Furious, they are capable of staging anything.
On the other hand, Olear does lend a surprising amount of credibility to so-called 9/11 truthers, writing, “What concerns me about the repudiation of the Hookers is that the 9/11 Truthers are being tarred with the same “crackpot” brush. Yes, many of the September Eleventh conspiracy theories are implausible, and too often veer, as conspiracy theories unfortunately tend to do, toward the anti-Semitic. But unlike with Sandy Hook, 9/11 conspiracy theories flow from a scientific fact: whatever the 9/11 Commission Report might claim, fire generated by burning jet fuel is not hot enough to melt steel.”
While Glenn Beck’s concern that the mass media is using already debunked conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook to discredit more legitimate arguments cited by second amendment advocates is well taken, his past history on supposedly “debunking” conspiracy theories which are actually proven facts doesn’t make him the most reliable person to perform such an undertaking.


skip the first four minutes

Australian Gun-grabbers Target Bolt-action Firearms

Australian Gun-grabbers Target Bolt-action Firearms
However, according to Ed Chenel, an Australian police officer, the government confiscation in fact made Australians more susceptible to violent crime, not less as Thompson argued.
"The first year results are now in: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent, Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent; Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent!)," Chenel wrote a year after the government forced disarmament. "In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)" In addition, there was a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly."
Following the ban, Australians began arming themselves with single shot and bolt action rifles not outlawed by the government.


Australian Gun-grabbers Target Bolt-action Firearms

Kurt Nimmo
January 23, 2013

Despite the denials of anti-Second Amendment activists, the ultimate goal of gun control is a total confiscation of all firearms.
Following the Port Arthur massacre in Australia in 1996, the government banned all semi-automatic guns and launched a buyback program that cost taxpayers $500 million and resulted in the destruction of over 600,000 personal firearms. Subsequent studies put the number at over a million firearms destroyed by the government.
"Australians have been following the Connecticut tragedy closely, and many say the US solution lies in following Australia's path, or at least reforming current laws," the Christian Science Monitor reported following the Sandy Hook massacre.
"I implore you to look at our experience," Labor Member of Parliament Kelvin Thomson wrote in an open letter to Congress. "As the number of guns in Australia reduced, so too did gun violence. It is simply not true that owning a gun makes you safer."
However, according to Ed Chenel, an Australian police officer, the government confiscation in fact made Australians more susceptible to violent crime, not less as Thompson argued.
"The first year results are now in: Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent, Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent; Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent!)," Chenel wrote a year after the government forced disarmament. "In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)" In addition, there was a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly."
Following the ban, Australians began arming themselves with single shot and bolt action rifles not outlawed by the government.
"Australians now own as many firearms as they did at the time of the Port Arthur shootings in 1996," China's Xinhua news agency reported in January. "More than one million guns were destroyed in the aftermath of the Port Arthur massacre, but the research by Professor Philip Alpers, from the Sydney University school of public health, said Australians have steadily restocked and the number of firearms in the community now totals around 3.2 million."
Alpers and the gun-grabbers in Australia are quite naturally concerned about law-abiding Australians owning weapons for self-defense. "Guns are a bit like a virus," he told ABC TV. "You clamp down on one type of gun, another one pops up and you have to deal with that."
Australian gun-grabbers are now targeting one shot and bolt-action rifles, stating that it only takes "one bullet" to kill somebody. "Remember that 90 per cent of gun deaths have nothing to do with mass killings," Alpers told the ABC. "They're actually suicides and domestic violence, and it only takes one bullet in a domestic violence incident."
Alpers and other anti-firearms activists reveal the underhanded incrementalism of gun control. The gun-grabbers say they are only interested in ridding society of military-styled weapons and want to protect the rights of ducks hunters and target shooters, but the fact is their ultimate goal is the elimination of all firearms.

Brussel Sprouts.


Just no.

DA14 will miss earth, but what about the moon?

what happens if this thing hits the moon? they say it will miss earth.......they say it is likely to take out a few satellites on its way through.......but they havent said much about the potential of it hitting the will probably miss the moon, but im curious anyway.

A glimmer of hope?

The results of the Israeli elections are in. Likud took a beating. The Knesset is now split exactly in half between left and right- 60 seats each. President Shimon Peres, who loathes Likud, will decide which party gets to form the next government. Interesting times.

hey, this is a cool motorcycle :)

and im not a big fan or anything, but this bike is awesome :)

Strike the balance

Attachment 16168

Both are very true.
Attached Images


Society conducting 'vast social experiment' without knowing its end
Published: 7 hours ago
by JEROME R. CORSI Email | Archive
Subscribe to feed
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Where's the REAL Birth Certificate?"
More ↓

Online ADHD TestWe have the answers you need. Free assessment. Immediate results.

NEW YORK – If lawmakers and authorities are truly concerned about stopping gun violence in schools, they need to take a close look at the prescription of psychotropic drugs for children and young people, says a leading psychiatrist.

In an exclusive in-person interview in New York City with WND, London-based Dr. David Healy criticized pharmaceutical companies that have made billions of dollars marketing Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, known as SSRIs.

Psychotropic drugs “prescribed for school children cause violent behavior,” Healy stated.

The drugs are widely used in the U.S. as antidepressants by doctors working in the mental health field and increasingly by primary care doctors, he noted.

Healey insisted the problem today is that doctors working with schools to control the behavior of children are inclined to prescribe SSRI drugs without serious consideration of adverse consequences.

“The pharmaceutical companies made these drugs with the idea of making money,” he said. “There’s a wide range of problems when it comes to looking at these drugs for children. Very few children have serious problems that warrant treatment with pills that have the risks SSRI drugs have.”

The drugs can make children “aggressive and hostile,” he noted.

“Children taking SSRI drugs are more likely to harm or to injure other children at school,” said Healy. “The child may be made suicidal.

“We are giving drugs to children who are passing through critical development stages, and as a society we are really conducting a vast experiment and no one really knows what the outcome of that will be.”

Healey cautioned that there is a very high correlation between mass shootings and use of the drugs.

“When roughly nine out of every 10 cases in these school shootings and mass shootings involve these drugs being prescribed, then at least a significant proportion of these cases were either caused by the drugs or the drugs made a significant contribution to the problem,” he said.

President Obama, in a series of 23 presidential memoranda and proclamations signed last week, called for the Centers for Disease control to undertake research to examine gun violence and to explore medical means to control the problem.

WND contended that putting more mental illness screening into schools would actually increase the incidence of school shootings, not reduce the violence.

“You can draw a line between the number of child psychiatrists in the United States and the number of school shootings, and you will find that both have gone up in the same direction at the same time,” he said.

He sees a “propaganda campaign” being conducted in the U.S. in the wake of the Aurora, Colo., cinema shooting and the Newtown, Conn., school shooting asserting gun violence is being caused by mental illness and could be stopped by additional school programs that screen for it.

“If school children are screened for mental illness problems, this presumably will lead more medical doctors to put more students on more pills,” he said. “I would predict then the outcome of more school screenings for mental illness will be more mass killings, even if the guns are taken away and the mass killings are not done with guns.”



Dare Me Two

Do you dare me to sign my own early death certificate... ?


HOLY SHIT, Many of you know me well enough to know I am well connected but contacts never reveal shit, well, these shootings.........
Ok look, you know I don't post very much, and I worry when I do as it is normally something that I am aware of that I feel should be out there on a platform like this so it can be dissected by intelligent out of the box thinkers, my sources and friends are important and I would never rat them out, but holy fucking shit, some things need to be out there for the sake of humanity, ethics and morality.

Ok, I am very worried about posting this, in fact I feel like it's betrayal, but some things are just too big for the soul to contain without a lifetime of regret, I won't act upon it so I guess it's passing the buck which renders me a coward, but hey ho.

I had a brief encounter with somebody this morning.

These shooters are real, and no, there are no actors, no mysterious children popping up after the event.

This goes back a very very long way, believe it or not it goes back to Mons...., (whom I thought was just a food ingredient producer lol) it appears they were AND are chemical company whom have been involved in chem production for agents used in wars, (this is crazy shit)!

Anyway, it seems in the eyes of tptb, drugs are not bad, in fact they are fucking brilliant for their agenda, so here was the conversation.....

ME "Hey, I trust you're well, have you had much involvement in the Algeria situation, if so I bet you've been manic!"

HER "Oh good lord no, thank goodness I got reassigned to an old project which I knew would bear fruit but when I was pulled off that for the Syria 2007 nightmare thought I had to kiss that baby goodbye"

Then loads of polite convo and personal shit, blah blah etc, so..........

ME "The Yanks have their knickers in a twist over new legislation regarding assault weapons in light of the recent shootings which is laughable, legislation will always go the way of business, everyone will buy more guns lol"


HER "Well that was my 'baby', all drugs harm, the user and those around the user, even the dealer lol, but the fruit was bared, we found perfection, you remember I love riddles right?

ME "Indeed I do."

HER "George made a mistake, he was never aware of the beauty he had slain."

ME "Like old times, thats a taster, give me a little more."

HER "That dragon was a female, and she breaths more than fire, she breaths perfection" (then a wink)

Then precedes to say "Darling it's been wonderful to see you, I must make tracks as the snow is settling and Heathrow is fucked"


I had no fucking idea at the time and riddles were always historically fun in our relationship so I started REALLY thinking!

There is a reason why I can post the transcript without concern of identity outing but cant say why, sorry.

A certain company manufactured a drug years ago, this company is now tied so tightly with government that it is crazy, after many years of trials in the field and in theatre, it is now perfect.

We are fucked, they have complete control, total control, the only protection are weapons, the one thing they intended to take.

I can not be sure, but from what I can gather from various sources and conversations...................

The most dangerous drug in the world: 'Devil's Breath' chemical from Colombia can block free will, wipe memory and even kill












For MOJO...with love...from Ducky

"I never meant to break your heart....but you broke mine first"

data:newerPageTitle data:olderPageTitle data:homeMsg


THE FREEDOM ROAD: In "Road to Freedom" David Icke gives a keynote lecture reveals many secrets where hidden by those who govern us and manipulate. Among other things, talks about the Freemasons and the Illuminati and its relationship with many of the U.S. Presidents. En "Camino a la Libertad" David Icke nos ofrece una magistral conferencia donde desvela numerosos secretos ocultos por aquellos que nos gobiernan y manipulan. Entre otras cosas, nos habla sobre la masonería y los iluminatis y su relación con muchos de los presidentes de EE.UU.

Special music for relaxation, meditation and healing.

Special music for relaxation, meditation and healing. Are frequencies that affect the balance and harmony of the body, restoring energy patterns. Among other tunes are Ahu Saglam, Arnica Montana and music with dolphins and whales. Música especial para relajarse, meditar y sanar. Son frecuencias que inciden en el equilibrio y la armonía del cuerpo, restableciendo los patrones energéticos. Entre otras, se encuentran melodías de Ahu Saglam, Arnica Montana y música con delfines y ballenas. RELAJACIÓN MÚSICA, MÚSICA RELAX, MÚSICA MEDITACIÓN, MEDITATION MUSIC, FRECUENCIAS SANADORAS, MUSICA ALTERNATIVA, MUSICA SANADORA, MUSICA PARA SANAR EL ALMA, HEALING MUSIC, MUSIC FOR HEALING,healing frequency, FREQUENCY TO HEAL, MUSICA ESPIRITUAL, SPIRITUAL MUSIC, MUSICA DELFINES, DOLPHIN MUSIC, MUSICA NEW AGE, MUSICA REIKI, MUSICA YOGA, MUSICA DE BALLENAS, RELAX MUSIC FRECUENCIAS SAGRADAS SOLFEGGIO